MOST MALAYSIANS CANNOT AFFORD TO RETIRE
25 Oct 2017
Poor EPF returns
This year, EPF raised the minimum savings target by age 55 from RM197,000 to RM228,000. But only 18% of members have this much, far short of its target of getting at least half its members to meet the minimum level by 2021. Low investment returns and withdrawals permitted – for housing, health and education – imply even less for retirement.
More than two-thirds (68%) of EPF members aged 54 had less than RM50,000 in EPF savings! With the household poverty line income at RM930 monthly, RM50,000 in savings will only last 4½ years. The bottom fifth of EPF members have average savings of only RM6,909!
According to EPF, 70% of members who withdraw their funds at age 55 use up their savings less than a decade after retiring. Most EPF savings are therefore not enough to stay out of poverty after retirement.
There are 32 million people in Malaysia, with 69% of the population of ‘working age’ between 15 and 65. Only 48% of the labour force of 14.5 million have active EPF accounts.
Around a tenth works for the Federal Government and are eligible for pensions, contributing to other pension funds, such as the KWAP (Kumpulan Wang Persaraan [Diperbadankan]) and the LTAT (Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera).
Others remain uncovered. Many employees, in the informal sector and others casually employed, do not have active EPF accounts, while many in farming and the informal sector are self-employed.
EPF assets diversified
A late colonial innovation from the early 1950s, EPF is now the world’s seventh largest sovereign pension fund in terms of total assets. In its early decades, EPF had to buy relatively low yielding government bonds, providing the government with a steady source of cheap funds. By 2015, its investment assets were RM685bil, after growing about 10% annually over the previous 15 years. EPF held considerable assets in ‘cash’ in the past.
Investments in traditional, lower risk, domestic, fixed income assets, especially Malaysian government bonds, remain significant. Of ‘held-to-maturity’ (HTM) investment assets, EPF has been accumulating Government sukuk (‘zero coupon bonds’) holdings. By 2015, these came to 29% of total HTM assets, rising rapidly from 2.7% in 2006.
Since the 1980s, EPF has become increasingly market oriented, and has been investing abroad since 1996. Over the years, riskier assets have come to account for increasingly large shares of total investment.
Ostensibly in search of higher returns, EPF’s foreign investments have grown. Investments in equities and properties abroad have been rising in recent years. EPF has gone into foreign markets since 1996, with investments in equity, fixed income yielding assets and real estate, especially in the US, UK, Singapore, China and Australia.
Significantly, it is now allowed to be a major investor, or even operator of businesses, i.e., well beyond being a passive portfolio investor — a significant departure from past practice. This has undoubtedly affected the context, management incentives and governance of the fund, opening the door to abuse of various kinds.
Holdings in other asset classes, especially equity investments, have grown in recent decades. Direct real estate and infrastructure investments, such as toll highways and waste management, have grown since 2011, most significantly, its 49% stake in PLUS costing RM9bil in 2011.
EPF declared a dividend of 5.7% for 2016, to its 14.72 million members, with a total pay-out of RM37.2bil. Total gross investment income was RM44.2bil in 2015, with domestic (52%) and foreign (48%) sources contributing almost equally. While income from interest, profits and dividends remains stable, capital gains accounted for more than a quarter of EPF income in 2015.
Why EPF returns are low
As EPF savings do not provide most retired employees with enough to live above the poverty line after retirement, it is failing to serve its intended purpose. For over four-fifths of members, poor returns to their EPF savings will prevent them from retiring in comfort. Clearly, depressed wages, low EPF investment returns and high household debt are not serving most Malaysians well.
EPF and other retirement fund professionals need to be allowed to do their jobs to best serve their primary stakeholders, namely retirees, current and future. But political interference is preventing EPF professionals from serving members’ interests better.
Such political intervention in investment decisions does not inspire either EPF members or public confidence. In the past, EPF members were resigned to low returns as their funds were mainly used to buy government bonds offering low returns. With EPF investments more diversified in recent decades, EPF returns increased, but not by much.
Hence, EPF members do not appreciate their retirement funds being used to buy low yielding US infrastructure funds.
The Malaysian public does not want government leaders to sacrifice their interests to curry favour with a foreign leader, especially one who has never offered any concessions to advance our national interests.